In the embedded wireless networking world, Qualcomm’s IPQ40xx series SoCs have long been the backbone of many enterprise-grade routers, repeaters, mesh networking devices, and industrial wireless solutions. Among them, the IPQ4029 and IPQ4028 are two closely related chips with subtle but important differences in functionality and application. 1. Core Specifications ComparisonFeatureIPQ4029IPQ4028
CPUQuad-core ARM Cortex-A7 @ 717MHzQuad-core ARM Cortex-A7 @ 717MHz
WirelessDual-band 2.4GHz + 5GHzDual-band 2.4GHz + 5GHz
WiFi StandardIEEE 802.11ac Wave 2 (WiFi 5)IEEE 802.11ac Wave 2 (WiFi 5)
MU-MIMOSupportedSupported
Ethernet5 x GbE5 x GbE
Integrated BluetoothYesNo
Crypto EngineSupportedSupported
Industrial Temperature-40°C ~ 85°C-40°C ~ 85°C
PackageBGABGA✅ Key Advantages of IPQ4029:
Integrated Bluetooth (typically Bluetooth 4.1), suitable for IoT pairing and gateway applications.
Ideal for use in mesh routers and smart gateways that require Bluetooth alongside WiFi.
✅ Key Positioning of IPQ4028:
No Bluetooth module, suitable for WiFi-only applications with BOM cost sensitivity.
A slightly simplified version ideal for high-volume consumer markets such as entry-level mesh routers or cost-effective CPEs.
2. Software Support & Development EcosystemQualcomm offers robust SDK support for the IPQ40xx series (QSDK). Both IPQ4029 and IPQ4028 are well supported in popular open-source platforms such as OpenWRT, OpenSync, and OpenWiFi. Hardware driver compatibility is mature, allowing for easy migration between the two chips.
However:
Bluetooth functionality is only available with the IPQ4029.
Some third-party SDKs or mesh stacks may be tested primarily on IPQ4029 by default.
3. Recommended Application ScenariosApplicationRecommended Chip
Enterprise Mesh RoutersIPQ4029
Industrial IoT Gateways (with Bluetooth)IPQ4029
Cost-optimized Home RoutersIPQ4028
Education/Commercial Wireless CPEsIPQ4028
Multi-protocol Smart Home GatewaysIPQ40294. ConclusionWhile the IPQ4029 and IPQ4028 share much of the same core hardware and wireless capabilities, the inclusion of integrated Bluetooth in the IPQ4029 makes it more versatile for complex, feature-rich applications. The IPQ4028, on the other hand, provides a leaner solution for budget-conscious WiFi-only use cases. Recommendation Summary:
Choose IPQ4029 for Bluetooth integration, IoT applications, or mesh with multi-protocol support.
Choose IPQ4028 for pure WiFi solutions where cost and simplicity are priorities.
If you're interested in reference board designs (like the DR40X9 series), mesh software solutions, or OpenWRT development services based on the IPQ40xx platform, feel free to contact us for more technical documentation and support.